H2H data updated: 2026-11-07 00:00 UTC

Alla Kudryavtseva vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1

Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2013 Stanford round of 32 6-1 6-7(4) 3-0 (ret.).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alla Kudryavtseva
Russia Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-4 6-2 Alla Kudryavtseva #169 Match data Jun 12, 2016 Q2 Q Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Tamira Paszek 6-1 6-7(4) 3-0 (ret.) Alla Kudryavtseva #150 Match data Jul 25, 2013* R32 Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alla Kudryavtseva — #56 1,056 1,671 85 139 37.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamira Paszek — #366 169 1,783 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alla Kudryavtseva Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2005 0–1 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2006 4–4 50.0% #134 1,504 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2007 7–14 33.3% #77 1,471 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2008 12–18 40.0% #71 1,551 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2009 12–21 36.4% #89 1,567 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2010 18–21 46.2% #60 1,632 0 1 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #103 1,570 0 1 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2012 2–6 25.0% #212 1,509 0 1 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2013 3–4 42.9% #170 1,505 0 1 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2014 5–13 27.8% #98 1,487 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2015 2–8 20.0% #175 1,451 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2016 5–4 55.6% #142 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2017 0–2 0.0% #356 1,532 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alla Kudryavtseva Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2006 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2007 3 10 13 23.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2009 5 12 17 29.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2010 13 13 26 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 91 147 38.1% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 16 28 42.9% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 181/215 of Alla Kudryavtseva's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alla Kudryavtseva Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2007 10/21 1.4 3.7 57.6% 55.8% 44.9% 48.6% 46.3% 51.3% 43.1% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2008 26/30 1.8 3.0 61.1% 59.3% 43.9% 51.7% 45.8% 53.5% 46.2% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2009 29/33 1.6 3.4 60.8% 54.9% 44.6% 47.5% 51.3% 51.5% 42.0% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2010 36/39 2.1 2.6 58.7% 60.6% 44.4% 50.8% 44.2% 53.9% 44.1% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2011 36/38 2.4 3.8 56.1% 60.1% 41.0% 49.8% 46.9% 51.9% 41.1% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2012 7/8 1.9 2.6 56.1% 61.9% 46.3% 43.9% 53.4% 54.0% 44.3% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2013 5/7 3.4 1.8 58.3% 66.5% 42.3% 48.0% 76.8% 56.3% 45.2% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2014 15/18 2.1 4.4 62.8% 59.3% 41.1% 42.1% 43.2% 52.4% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 7/10 1.3 4.4 70.0% 56.4% 40.5% 42.7% 44.8% 51.8% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 8/9 2.5 5.3 59.5% 61.1% 38.0% 47.1% 52.2% 51.7% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 2/2 2.5 6.0 59.6% 55.1% 44.2% 42.3% 51.7% 50.8% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 181/224 2.0 3.4 59.5% 59.1% 43.0% 48.4% 47.7% 52.7% 43.1% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.3% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alla Kudryavtseva Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.2 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -49 -178 +8 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.40
17 2005 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 2008 1697 128.9 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.56
18 2006 1505 102.4 — — — — +15 — — 47.4% -0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.58 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +25 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
19 2007 1471 110.7 -2.11 -0.89 0.886 47.4% -30 +118 — 37.0% -0.93 3–3 (50%) — — +0.28 2010 1643 119.0 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2008 1552 118.9 -1.27 +1.61 0.994 49.9% -30 -23 +91 45.2% -0.26 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 97.1 +0.21 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +85 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2009 1567 115.2 -3.32 -1.08 0.866 46.9% -54 +12 +68 37.8% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.32 2012 1677 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -92 -243 +188 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2010 1633 116.1 -1.58 -0.03 0.956 49.0% -26 -115 +21 46.0% -0.49 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 +0.56 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2011 1571 106.0 -3.04 -3.05 0.854 46.5% +19 -106 +52 38.5% -1.21 6–2 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 107.3 +0.38 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2012 1510 99.2 -2.09 -0.77 0.964 48.9% +38 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–2 — — +0.59 2015 1443 101.3 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +33 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2013 1506 109.2 -0.85 +0.31 1.036 50.2% +31 — +116 57.1% 0.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.48 2016 1531 113.8 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 34.4% -1.12 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2014 1488 114.2 -2.38 -0.41 0.877 47.1% +42 -63 — 36.4% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 95.6 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1452 103.8 -3.22 -0.55 0.802 45.0% +27 — — 19.0% -1.81 1–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1612 115.8 -2.01 +1.48 0.969 49.2% -29 -124 — 47.6% -0.71 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1533 98.9 -3.36 -1.56 0.865 46.9% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1509 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1511 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1671 113.9 -2.30 -0.63 0.911 47.9% -8 -32 +63 40.2% -0.82 32–36 (47%) 18–23 (44%) 100.1 +1.07 — 1783 124.8 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -17 -177 +137 43.9% -0.51 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.