H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alla Kudryavtseva vs Vania King H2H: 1-2
Vania King holds a 2–1 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vania King leads 1–0 on clay, while Alla Kudryavtseva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vania King won the 2012 Pattaya fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2012* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Vania King | 6-1 6-3 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
| Jun 10, 2010* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Alla Kudryavtseva | 6-1 6-2 | Vania King | Match data |
| May 22, 2008* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Vania King | 6-1 6-7(1) 6-3 | Alla Kudryavtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla Kudryavtseva | #841 | #56 | 1,056 | 1,670 | 85 | 138 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alla Kudryavtseva | Vania King | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #142 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |