H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Agnes Szavay H2H: 2-2
Alona Bondarenko and Agnes Szavay are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Agnes Szavay leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2009 Beijing second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 37
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 6-3 6-0 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2009* | Budapest | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Agnes Szavay | 6-1 6-2 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2007* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Agnes Szavay | 6-1 6-4 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Alona Bondarenko | 6-2 6-3 | Agnes Szavay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Agnes Szavay | #1,023 | #13 | 2,059 | 1,846 | 116 | 90 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Agnes Szavay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #28 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #37 | 1,784 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #259 | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |