H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 2-1
Alona Bondarenko holds a 2–1 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 New Haven fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2009* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-1 6-1 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 6-1 6-2 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2007* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Amélie Mauresmo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 |