H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alona Bondarenko vs Emilie Loit H2H: 0-1

Emilie Loit holds a 1–0 lead over Alona Bondarenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2005 Modena round of 32 6-2 6-3.

UKR Age 42 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #98 6-2 6-3 Alona Bondarenko #78 Match data Jul 14, 2005* R32 Modena Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alona Bondarenko #1,151 #19 2,020 1,873 155 144 51.8% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alona Bondarenko Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 0–2 0.0% #187 1,471 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2004 1–1 50.0% #110 1,481 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 2005 13–16 44.8% #79 1,520 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2006 24–22 52.2% #32 1,686 0 1 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 2007 33–24 57.9% #21 1,760 0 1 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 2008 26–21 55.3% #33 1,784 0 1 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2009 30–25 54.5% #32 1,781 0 1 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2010 24–19 55.8% #36 1,734 0 2 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2011 4–14 22.2% #257 1,567 0 2 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alona Bondarenko Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2007 13 15 28 46.4% 14 6 20 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2008 12 12 24 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2010 14 13 27 51.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 84 85 169 49.7% 53 41 94 56.4% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 233/295 of Alona Bondarenko's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alona Bondarenko Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2005 6/29 1.5 2.8 68.9% 57.2% 43.6% 56.2% 58.0% 52.4% 41.8% —/—
21 2006 25/46 1.2 3.0 67.9% 59.5% 45.9% 56.6% 47.4% 55.3% 44.9% —/—
22 2007 53/57 1.1 2.0 66.0% 59.9% 44.6% 52.4% 50.9% 55.1% 45.2% —/—
23 2008 41/47 1.1 3.4 66.5% 58.0% 45.7% 43.8% 48.8% 53.8% 43.7% —/—
24 2009 51/55 0.6 2.4 71.4% 58.8% 46.2% 52.5% 52.4% 55.1% 45.5% 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 2010 41/43 0.7 2.4 71.0% 58.3% 46.9% 52.4% 54.5% 55.1% 46.9% 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 2011 16/18 0.4 1.7 70.6% 55.6% 43.7% 47.7% 42.3% 52.1% 38.0% 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 —/— 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 —/— 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 —/— 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 —/— 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
Career 233/299 0.9 2.5 68.8% 58.7% 45.6% 51.1% 50.7% 54.6% 44.7% 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alona Bondarenko Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1472 94.9 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 +0.11 1997 1499 112.1 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.22
19 2004 1482 96.5 40.0% -0.60 1–0 0–1 -0.03 1998 1512 121.9 +45 +20 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 +0.24
20 2005 1521 112.3 -1.49 -1.11 0.878 47.5% +40 -63 +82 43.1% -0.58 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +0.41 1999 1424 101.4 +104 +28 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) +0.55
21 2006 1687 123.8 -0.78 +0.24 1.005 50.2% -5 -143 -110 51.0% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +1.41 2000 1458 109.0 +67 +11 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 +0.50
22 2007 1761 137.3 -0.13 +1.65 1.007 50.2% -73 -11 -63 54.0% +0.27 11–5 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 109.1 +1.18 2001 1547 113.0 -32 -21 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 2008 1784 136.8 -0.67 +0.58 0.946 48.7% -58 +3 -36 50.0% -0.35 16–6 (73%) 8–5 (62%) 110.9 -1.55 2002 1626 113.6 -91 +30 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2009 1782 136.9 -0.55 +1.41 1.015 50.3% -29 +22 -82 52.7% +0.16 12–9 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 98.3 +1.11 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2010 1734 135.2 -0.49 +2.66 1.044 51.0% -29 +66 -15 53.0% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 2–8 (20%) 97.2 +0.70 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2011 1568 107.9 -1.98 -3.35 0.794 45.4% +46 +137 25.0% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–1 +0.04 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +0.07
Career 1874 134.0 -0.61 +1.02 0.985 49.7% -24 -5 -40 49.4% -0.08 63–41 (61%) 28–31 (47%) 106.4 +1.14 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.