H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 0-2
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 2–0 lead over Alona Bondarenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Elena Camerin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2007 Toronto second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2007 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-4 6-3 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2007* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-3 6-4 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |