H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Marie-Ève Pelletier H2H: 1-0
Alona Bondarenko holds a 1–0 lead over Marie-Ève Pelletier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alona Bondarenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2005 Hyderabad quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2005* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Marie-Ève Pelletier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Marie-Ève Pelletier | #1,145 | #106 | 346 | 1,500 | 7 | 35 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Marie-Ève Pelletier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #685 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #153 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,357 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,384 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,383 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,377 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,358 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,351 | 0 | 0 |