H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Melinda Czink H2H: 2-2
Alona Bondarenko and Melinda Czink are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Melinda Czink leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Alona Bondarenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2009 Brisbane third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2009* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Melinda Czink | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| May 12, 2006* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Alona Bondarenko | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2006* | Bangalore | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Melinda Czink | 6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2005* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alona Bondarenko | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |