H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alona Bondarenko vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 1-1
Alona Bondarenko and Tatiana Golovin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 1–0 on grass, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2006 Stanford third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2006* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tatiana Golovin | 7-5 6-2 | Alona Bondarenko | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alona Bondarenko | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | #1,151 | #19 | 2,020 | 1,872 | 154 | 143 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alona Bondarenko | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2005 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #79 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #257 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |