H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Alycia Parks vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 1-0

Alycia Parks holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alycia Parks leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alycia Parks won the 2023 Lyon final 7-6(7) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alycia Parks
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Caroline Garcia
France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alycia Parks #79 7-6(7) 7-5 Caroline Garcia #5 Match data Feb 5, 2023* F Lyon WTA 250 Hard
Caroline Garcia #63 6-3 1-6 6-3 Alycia Parks #246 Match data Aug 14, 2021 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alycia Parks #79 #40 1,208 1,815 55 81 40.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alycia Parks Caroline Garcia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0
20 2021 2–4 33.3% #214 1,494 0 0 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1
21 2022 3–3 50.0% #75 1,734 0 0 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1
22 2023 13–21 38.2% #85 1,660 0 1 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3
23 2024 4–10 28.6% #82 1,670 0 1 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5
24 2025 15–23 39.5% #78 1,614 0 1 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6
25 2026 18–20 47.4% #79 1,646 0 1 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7
26 — — — — — — — 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alycia Parks Caroline Garcia
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2023 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
23 2024 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
24 2025 13 17 30 43.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2026 12 13 25 48.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 53 92 42.4% 13 20 33 39.4% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 118/136 of Alycia Parks's and 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alycia Parks Caroline Garcia
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5%
20 2021 6/6 7.8 7.5 50.2% 65.6% 39.1% 49.3% 33.3% 52.6% 39.9% 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9%
21 2022 6/6 7.0 7.5 59.0% 63.9% 44.9% 55.0% 56.7% 56.4% 39.1% 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3%
22 2023 34/34 7.9 9.1 53.0% 69.3% 42.6% 53.1% 44.1% 56.4% 38.1% 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3%
23 2024 14/14 4.9 8.8 51.7% 64.6% 38.1% 43.8% 34.9% 51.8% 38.0% 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6%
24 2025 21/38 5.2 8.0 53.7% 65.0% 39.9% 50.9% 37.0% 53.4% 36.7% 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3%
25 2026 37/38 5.6 6.1 54.2% 68.5% 43.3% 52.0% 47.1% 56.9% 40.1% 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4%
Career — 118/136 6.3 7.7 53.5% 67.3% 41.7% 51.2% 42.8% 55.3% 38.6% — 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alycia Parks Caroline Garcia
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.70
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 — — 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 — 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45
20 2021 1494 104.8 -1.89 -1.34 0.841 46.0% — +103 — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.03 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60
21 2022 1735 115.5 +0.46 +0.89 0.896 48.2% -17 — — 46.2% -0.31 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.30 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37
22 2023 1660 125.8 +0.06 -3.71 0.875 47.4% +26 -90 -67 41.3% -0.73 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.3 -0.98 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69
23 2024 1670 107.3 -2.42 -3.22 0.788 45.2% +20 — — 31.3% -1.50 2–2 (50%) — — -0.06 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32
24 2025 1615 133.0 -2.00 -3.95 0.787 45.3% +41 -189 — 41.4% -0.69 5–6 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 99.2 -0.43 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23
25 2026 1647 128.2 -0.08 -2.38 0.929 48.6% +44 -64 — 47.8% -0.49 7–7 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 103.0 +1.96 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 — 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 — 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1724 135.4 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 — — 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.54
Career — 1816 125.9 -0.72 -2.92 0.863 47.1% +34 -79 -67 42.1% -0.74 21–23 (48%) 16–14 (53%) 103.1 +0.16 — 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.