H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 0-1
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2021 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 |