H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Carol Zhao H2H: 1-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Carol Zhao in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Toronto second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 31
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-1 6-3 | Carol Zhao | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Carol Zhao | #432 | #131 | 458 | 1,515 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Carol Zhao | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #293 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #176 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #219 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |