H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Emma Navarro H2H: 4-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 4–0 lead over Emma Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Queens quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | Queens | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Amanda Anisimova | 6-3 6-3 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2025 | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 7-5 7-6(1) | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2024* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Emma Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |