H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Maddison Inglis

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Amanda Anisimova vs Maddison Inglis.

United States Age 25 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 0
0 main-draw meetings
Australia Age 28 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Anisimova #84 6-3 1-6 6-0 Maddison Inglis #146 Match data Aug 7, 2021 Q1 Q Canadian Open WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,125 179 107 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Maddison Inglis #134 #112 654 1,674 10 25 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Maddison Inglis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0
17 2019 23–13 63.9% #24 1,765 0 1
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,778 0 1 2016 0–2 0.0% #551 1,483 0 0
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,892 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #130 1,444 0 0
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,114 0 4 2021 4–8 33.3% #141 1,473 0 0
24 2026 23–12 65.7% #10 2,011 0 4 2022 3–5 37.5% #180 1,484 0 0
27 2025 0–6 0.0% #164 1,581 0 0
28 2026 3–2 60.0% #134 1,627 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Maddison Inglis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7%
17 2019 9 8 17 52.9% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 2021 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2026 18 9 27 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2022 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2025 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2026 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 112 70 182 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% 9 19 28 32.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 32/35 of Maddison Inglis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Maddison Inglis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% —/—
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% —/—
17 2019 35/36 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% —/—
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% 2016 2/2 1.0 2.5 54.9% 46.5% 36.8% 29.2% 37.5% 42.0% 34.0%
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% —/—
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% —/—
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% —/—
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2020 2/2 0.5 3.0 71.5% 51.6% 41.5% 45.8% 52.5% 48.6% 39.3%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% 2021 12/12 2.0 2.8 62.7% 59.4% 45.8% 48.3% 28.1% 54.2% 39.6%
24 2026 31/36 3.5 4.0 64.0% 68.9% 50.4% 47.4% 54.2% 62.3% 47.2% 2022 8/8 2.6 3.6 66.2% 60.4% 40.2% 48.3% 61.8% 54.1% 42.3%
27 —/— 2025 4/6 2.3 4.0 59.3% 53.7% 47.4% 40.7% 25.8% 51.4% 36.5%
28 —/— 2026 4/5 1.8 2.0 63.5% 60.8% 47.0% 40.1% 52.4% 55.8% 36.9%
Career 258/290 2.6 3.8 64.6% 65.1% 48.7% 53.7% 50.1% 59.2% 45.3% 32/35 2.0 3.0 63.3% 57.8% 43.9% 45.0% 41.4% 52.9% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Maddison Inglis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.25 -2.07 0.921 48.2% 33.3% -0.67 0–2 +0.19
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +12 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.18
17 2019 1765 138.6 +0.98 +4.05 1.126 52.6% -48 -32 -110 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) 104.3 +0.69
18 2020 1778 138.0 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -19 -30 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 -0.42 2016 1484 102.2 -2.40 -1.06 0.587 38.5% 0.0% -3.50 -0.15
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +8 -45 -146 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 92.9 -1.37
20 2022 1927 151.1 +2.94 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -73 -6 -126 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) 110.1 -2.09
21 2023 1794 127.1 -0.58 -0.40 0.923 48.2% -29 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 -0.26 2019 1477 102.4
22 2024 1892 146.4 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +36 -108 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.8 -1.57 2020 1445 97.5 -1.27 +0.38 0.766 44.5% 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.11
23 2025 2115 162.2 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +10 -238 -59 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) 113.5 -0.29 2021 1474 111.4 -2.32 -2.08 0.865 46.8% +4 33.3% -1.44 2–1 (67%) +0.33
24 2026 2012 157.7 +4.35 +4.19 1.250 54.7% +43 -142 +2 60.8% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 +1.28 2022 1485 99.8 -2.83 -0.47 0.921 48.4% +26 42.9% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +0.75
25 2023 1475 90.8
26 2024 1455 100.1
27 2025 1582 115.3 -2.30 -1.96 0.751 43.7% -5 14.3% -2.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) +0.01
28 2026 1628 113.3 +0.91 +0.33 0.836 46.3% +32 45.5% -0.82 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.15
Career 2126 156.9 +2.36 +2.51 1.111 52.2% -1 -68 -83 61.2% +0.77 49–44 (53%) 32–25 (56%) 106.2 -1.30 1674 109.6 -1.98 -1.14 0.832 46.1% +13 31.7% -1.51 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.