H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 1-0

Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2018 Indian Wells Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Anisimova
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pauline Parmentier
France Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Anisimova #149 6-2 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #94 Match data Mar 9, 2018* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,125 179 107 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,703 120 188 39.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Pauline Parmentier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 23–13 63.9% #24 1,765 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,778 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,506 0 0
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,892 0 2 2008 17–21 44.7% #61 1,581 0 2
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,114 0 4 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,533 0 2
24 2026 23–12 65.7% #10 2,011 0 4 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,443 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,439 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,464 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,522 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,459 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,579 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,657 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,683 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 11–22 33.3% #123 1,594 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,540 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Pauline Parmentier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 9 8 17 52.9% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 7 2 9 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 12 18 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2026 18 9 27 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 2 4 6 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 8 13 38.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 70 182 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — 66 99 165 40.0% 48 70 118 40.7% 5 17 22 22.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Pauline Parmentier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 35/36 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% 2005 1/3 2.0 5.0 50.0% 45.8% 29.2% 25.0% 100.0% 37.5% 30.8%
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% 2007 5/13 1.8 3.4 50.1% 63.3% 50.9% 51.4% 48.5% 57.2% 42.4%
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2008 31/38 4.3 4.1 56.0% 67.3% 43.8% 55.5% 44.4% 56.8% 40.6%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% 2009 17/18 2.9 4.2 58.2% 63.3% 43.6% 50.6% 40.6% 55.0% 40.8%
24 2026 31/36 3.5 4.0 64.0% 68.9% 50.4% 47.4% 54.2% 62.3% 47.2% 2010 17/18 3.8 4.5 56.9% 63.7% 42.1% 49.9% 45.9% 54.4% 40.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 15/18 2.4 3.8 58.1% 64.4% 43.8% 50.6% 47.5% 55.6% 41.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/29 3.4 3.8 58.8% 64.3% 46.8% 57.9% 50.1% 57.1% 41.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 10/11 1.6 5.2 60.7% 55.7% 40.2% 31.8% 43.5% 49.5% 37.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 17/17 1.9 4.2 57.9% 64.1% 38.9% 43.7% 43.9% 53.9% 40.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 11/11 2.7 4.6 58.6% 60.2% 50.4% 45.1% 41.8% 55.7% 35.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 28/28 3.0 3.7 58.0% 62.4% 47.0% 55.3% 47.8% 55.8% 43.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 3.0 4.3 57.0% 62.7% 44.2% 53.0% 48.5% 54.7% 43.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 31/31 2.4 3.7 60.1% 63.0% 43.0% 55.8% 43.6% 55.0% 40.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 32/33 2.2 3.0 58.0% 63.2% 43.8% 52.3% 41.7% 55.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 4/4 1.8 3.0 58.6% 59.5% 34.3% 42.8% 50.0% 49.2% 39.0%
Career — 258/290 2.6 3.8 64.6% 65.1% 48.7% 53.7% 50.1% 59.2% 45.3% — 281/308 2.9 3.9 57.9% 63.3% 44.0% 51.9% 45.6% 55.1% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Pauline Parmentier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.25 -2.07 0.921 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +12 — — 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1765 138.6 +0.98 +4.05 1.126 52.6% -48 -32 -110 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) 104.3 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 1778 138.0 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -19 -30 — 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +8 -45 -146 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 92.9 -1.37 2005 1507 109.7 -0.64 -0.15 0.492 34.5% — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — -0.04
20 2022 1927 151.1 +2.94 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -73 -6 -126 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) 110.1 -2.09 2006 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10
21 2023 1794 127.1 -0.58 -0.40 0.923 48.2% -29 — — 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2007 1612 120.9 +1.44 -0.59 0.989 49.5% +20 -83 — 67.9% +1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.74
22 2024 1892 146.4 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +36 -108 — 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.8 -1.57 2008 1581 112.4 +0.75 -3.13 0.940 48.5% -27 +58 +2 45.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.83
23 2025 2115 162.2 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +10 -238 -59 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) 113.5 -0.29 2009 1534 107.8 -0.66 -1.62 0.907 48.1% -3 +30 — 38.1% -0.69 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.22
24 2026 2012 157.7 +4.36 +4.19 1.250 54.7% +44 -142 +2 60.8% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 +1.28 2010 1444 105.5 -1.26 -3.39 0.883 47.3% +88 +19 — 33.3% -0.80 2–7 (22%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.96
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1440 104.6 -0.47 -2.33 0.929 48.2% +40 +36 — 34.1% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.9 +0.55
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1567 120.4 +0.94 -2.00 0.973 49.6% +13 -61 — 47.1% -0.16 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 +0.14
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1464 92.4 -3.33 -3.82 0.734 43.3% +53 -36 — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 1–1 — -0.02
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1522 116.7 -0.48 -2.01 0.875 47.1% -13 -8 — 39.5% -0.87 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.15
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1460 100.1 -1.71 -4.00 0.797 45.3% +53 -24 — 28.6% -1.86 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1580 120.0 -0.40 -0.40 0.976 49.3% -22 -16 — 49.2% -0.27 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -1.66
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1657 125.5 -1.45 -0.38 0.962 49.5% +18 -74 — 46.3% -0.16 5–7 (42%) 2–9 (18%) 94.8 -0.59
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1684 119.2 -0.79 -1.64 0.905 48.1% -42 +15 — 47.8% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–2 (71%) 108.1 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1594 114.6 -1.35 -2.58 0.887 47.3% +33 -57 -130 32.9% -0.99 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.6 -0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1540 98.6 -2.06 -1.56 0.767 44.0% — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.38
Career — 2126 156.9 +2.36 +2.51 1.111 52.2% -1 -68 -83 61.2% +0.77 49–44 (53%) 32–25 (56%) 106.2 -1.30 — 1703 118.5 -0.64 -1.98 0.911 48.0% +8 -5 -73 41.1% -0.62 40–52 (43%) 28–35 (44%) 98.1 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.