H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 1-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2018 Indian Wells first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 6-2 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |