H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Tatjana Maria H2H: 0-1
Tatjana Maria holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatjana Maria leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2025 Queens final 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2025 | Queens | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Tatjana Maria | 6-3 6-4 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Tatjana Maria | 2-6 6-2 6-0 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Tatjana Maria | #76 | #41 | 1,320 | 1,810 | 164 | 254 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Tatjana Maria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #72 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 |