H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Taylor Townsend H2H: 0-2
Taylor Townsend holds a 2–0 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Taylor Townsend leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Townsend won the 2018 US Open first round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2023 | Adelaide 2 | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Taylor Townsend | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Taylor Townsend | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Taylor Townsend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |