H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2018 Cincinnati Open first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | 6-3 6-4 | Timea Babos | Match data | Aug 15, 2018* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #10 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,125 | 179 | 107 | 62.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Timea Babos | #451 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,758 | 124 | 180 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #24 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #67 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,892 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,114 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 35–28 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #10 | 2,011 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,454 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,450 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2012 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 20 | 2022 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2013 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2024 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2025 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 73.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 2016 | 25 | 19 | 44 | 56.8% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2017 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 112 | 70 | 182 | 61.5% | 41 | 25 | 66 | 62.1% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | — | 90 | 113 | 203 | 44.3% | 25 | 45 | 70 | 35.7% | 9 | 22 | 31 | 29.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 283/304 of Timea Babos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2017 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 56.5% | 58.9% | 38.9% | 56.1% | 46.1% | 50.4% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 16/17 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 67.0% | 66.6% | 51.5% | 59.8% | 49.3% | 61.5% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 35/36 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 65.4% | 63.1% | 48.2% | 61.3% | 48.8% | 57.6% | 47.7% | 2010 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 57.1% | 61.1% | 37.0% | 50.0% | 16.7% | 50.8% | 33.3% |
| 18 | 2020 | 20/21 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 66.6% | 60.7% | 45.3% | 46.4% | 44.0% | 55.2% | 43.6% | 2011 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 60.9% | 71.5% | 44.6% | 50.0% | 51.0% | 61.3% | 43.0% |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/29 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 66.0% | 65.3% | 47.5% | 50.6% | 54.4% | 59.4% | 46.2% | 2012 | 26/29 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 60.5% | 65.8% | 43.9% | 52.1% | 43.9% | 57.0% | 41.9% |
| 20 | 2022 | 44/47 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 65.6% | 66.5% | 48.7% | 52.8% | 50.6% | 60.3% | 44.5% | 2013 | 24/25 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 57.6% | 62.5% | 43.5% | 48.6% | 46.0% | 54.5% | 39.3% |
| 21 | 2023 | 9/9 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 65.2% | 61.7% | 44.6% | 47.8% | 42.5% | 55.7% | 40.9% | 2014 | 13/15 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 60.5% | 65.3% | 43.7% | 57.7% | 37.2% | 56.8% | 38.9% |
| 22 | 2024 | 28/29 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 61.6% | 61.3% | 49.1% | 55.4% | 53.8% | 56.5% | 44.0% | 2015 | 25/33 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 67.1% | 62.8% | 48.2% | 50.8% | 42.4% | 57.7% | 38.1% |
| 23 | 2025 | 44/64 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 67.4% | 49.9% | 56.3% | 47.4% | 61.1% | 44.5% | 2016 | 57/63 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 62.3% | 66.7% | 46.0% | 50.8% | 46.3% | 58.9% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/36 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 68.9% | 50.4% | 47.4% | 54.2% | 62.3% | 47.2% | 2017 | 46/46 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 62.3% | 68.8% | 43.7% | 54.7% | 49.3% | 59.4% | 40.0% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 42/43 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 68.8% | 46.8% | 57.6% | 44.3% | 60.0% | 41.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22/22 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 58.6% | 64.9% | 40.5% | 59.3% | 38.6% | 54.7% | 37.9% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 59.2% | 63.9% | 42.1% | 38.2% | 45.8% | 54.9% | 31.3% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12/12 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 55.0% | 61.9% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 48.4% | 52.3% | 37.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 60.6% | 55.0% | 46.2% | 60.0% | 25.0% | 51.5% | 38.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 4.3 | 62.9% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 53.2% | 74.6% | 52.8% | 42.7% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2/2 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 57.7% | 62.3% | 54.4% | 77.3% | 19.6% | 59.0% | 34.4% |
| Career | — | 258/290 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 64.6% | 65.1% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 50.1% | 59.2% | 45.3% | — | 283/304 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 66.0% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 45.0% | 57.6% | 40.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1483 | 101.2 | -0.25 | -2.07 | 0.921 | 48.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1683 | 142.2 | +4.05 | +2.84 | 1.199 | 54.1% | +12 | — | — | 68.6% | +1.34 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1765 | 138.6 | +0.98 | +4.05 | 1.126 | 52.6% | -48 | -32 | -110 | 63.0% | +0.84 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–1 (86%) | 104.3 | +0.69 | 2010 | 1491 | 99.7 | +0.22 | -2.30 | 0.677 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 18 | 2020 | 1778 | 138.0 | -0.33 | +0.69 | 0.973 | 49.5% | -19 | -30 | — | 55.6% | +0.18 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.4 | -0.42 | 2011 | 1503 | 104.3 | +0.80 | +0.51 | 1.109 | 51.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.11 |
| 19 | 2021 | 1780 | 139.7 | +2.46 | +2.91 | 1.136 | 52.6% | +8 | -45 | -146 | 51.5% | +0.55 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.9 | -1.37 | 2012 | 1564 | 115.8 | +1.04 | -1.36 | 0.976 | 49.4% | +20 | -33 | +62 | 49.3% | -0.38 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.9 | +0.38 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1927 | 151.1 | +2.94 | +2.37 | 1.120 | 52.3% | -73 | -6 | -126 | 65.1% | +0.87 | 13–5 (72%) | 5–2 (71%) | 110.1 | -2.09 | 2013 | 1544 | 111.1 | -0.34 | -3.76 | 0.862 | 46.9% | +14 | +4 | — | 38.6% | -0.95 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.2 | -0.12 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1794 | 127.1 | -0.58 | -0.40 | 0.923 | 48.2% | -29 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.26 | 2014 | 1484 | 110.0 | -0.66 | -2.53 | 0.902 | 47.8% | -2 | — | +90 | 40.0% | -0.17 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–3 (25%) | 91.7 | +0.74 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1892 | 146.4 | +0.57 | +1.45 | 1.010 | 50.3% | +36 | -108 | — | 62.3% | +0.41 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.8 | -1.57 | 2015 | 1563 | 124.4 | +0.04 | -1.97 | 0.900 | 47.9% | -39 | -34 | +34 | 38.2% | -0.59 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | 99.5 | -2.03 |
| 23 | 2025 | 2115 | 162.2 | +3.85 | +2.19 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +10 | -238 | -59 | 66.7% | +1.09 | 15–4 (79%) | 9–5 (64%) | 113.5 | -0.29 | 2016 | 1708 | 138.3 | +2.77 | +0.15 | 1.051 | 51.1% | -28 | -88 | -104 | 53.8% | +0.53 | 11–9 (55%) | 7–12 (37%) | 101.7 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2026 | 2012 | 157.7 | +4.35 | +4.19 | 1.250 | 54.7% | +43 | -142 | +2 | 60.8% | +1.05 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.9 | +1.28 | 2017 | 1639 | 130.8 | +1.85 | -2.67 | 0.986 | 49.9% | +63 | -67 | -124 | 48.6% | -0.01 | 6–13 (32%) | 6–6 (50%) | 93.3 | +1.56 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1610 | 134.0 | +2.55 | -1.23 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +53 | -69 | -106 | 50.0% | +0.25 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–7 (30%) | 88.6 | +0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1595 | 114.5 | -1.44 | -4.46 | 0.838 | 46.6% | +29 | -87 | — | 35.4% | -1.15 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–3 (50%) | 93.4 | +0.77 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1540 | 108.8 | +0.56 | -3.13 | 0.694 | 43.3% | +28 | — | — | 7.7% | -2.85 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1496 | 105.1 | -3.04 | -3.61 | 0.789 | 45.0% | +56 | -88 | — | 29.2% | -1.79 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.01 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1454 | 101.3 | +1.41 | -1.79 | 0.796 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1481 | 113.2 | -0.36 | -1.04 | 0.905 | 48.0% | — | -15 | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1451 | 103.6 | -0.62 | +0.09 | 0.841 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | — | 2126 | 156.9 | +2.36 | +2.51 | 1.111 | 52.2% | -1 | -68 | -83 | 61.2% | +0.77 | 49–44 (53%) | 32–25 (56%) | 106.2 | -1.30 | — | 1758 | 128.1 | +1.05 | -1.91 | 0.952 | 49.0% | +18 | -54 | -13 | 44.6% | -0.28 | 38–68 (36%) | 39–50 (44%) | 90.6 | +0.30 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 5 | 11 | Nov 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Feb 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Belinda Bencic | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Oct 12, 2018 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 16, 2018 | H2H |
| Mona Barthel | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |