H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amanda Coetzer vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 1-0
Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Hana Mandlikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1990 Boca Raton fourth round 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Coetzer | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 |
| 19 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 |
| 20 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 |
| 21 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 |
| 25 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 |
| 26 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 |
| 27 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 |
| 28 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 |
| 29 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |