H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Coetzer vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 1-0

Amanda Coetzer holds a 1–0 lead over Hana Mandlikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 1990 Boca Raton round of 16 2-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #68 2-6 6-2 6-3 Hana Mandlikova #19 Match data Mar 9, 1990* R16 Boca Raton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,315 518 191 73.1% 4 0 0 4 19 27

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Coetzer Hana Mandlikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2
17 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,990 0 7
18 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,235 1 13
19 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0 1981 56–24 70.0% #5 2,127 2 16
20 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,025 2 16
21 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,982 2 16
22 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,084 2 21
23 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,213 3 24
24 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24
25 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,156 4 27
26 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27
27 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,945 4 27
28 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,810 4 27
29 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Coetzer Hana Mandlikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
17 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0%
19 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1981 11 3 14 78.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9%
20 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
22 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1%
23 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5%
24 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2%
25 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5%
26 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
28 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7% — 143 54 197 72.6% 119 46 165 72.1% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Coetzer Hana Mandlikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
16 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -128 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.62
17 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21 1979 1991 150.7 — — — — -306 -198 +6 67.9% +1.46 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 108.6 -0.72
18 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00 1980 2235 168.8 — — — — -89 -219 -70 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.8 -9.15
19 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77 1981 2127 168.7 — — — — -45 -13 +80 70.8% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -6.49
20 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99 1982 2025 155.2 — — — — +44 +111 +37 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -6.83
21 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59 1983 1983 163.6 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.35
22 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72 1984 2084 165.9 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -1.62
23 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38 1985 2213 169.9 — — — — +68 -92 -93 76.0% +1.84 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -4.75
24 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 1986 2242 174.9 — — — — +26 -48 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.78
25 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54 1987 2156 168.9 — — — — +16 +20 +142 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.19
26 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82 1988 2045 145.0 — — — — +89 +61 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30
27 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50 1989 1946 155.1 — — — — +75 +103 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -3.52
28 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42 1990 1810 125.0 — — — — +120 +176 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31
29 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49 — 2316 169.2 — — — — +11 -14 +17 70.3% +1.52 108–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.2 -6.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.