H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amanda Hopmans vs Rewa Harriman H2H: 1-0

Amanda Hopmans holds a 1–0 lead over Rewa Harriman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Hopmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Hopmans won the 2000 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Hopmans
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rewa Harriman
NZL Age 45

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Hopmans #83 6-3 6-3 Rewa Harriman Match data Jan 6, 2000* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rewa Harriman — — — 1,500 1 4 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Hopmans Rewa Harriman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
23 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Hopmans Rewa Harriman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1481 92.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1495 108.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1485 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1472 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.05
23 1999 1549 120.0 — — — — +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1539 112.0 — — — — +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1518 107.4 — — — — +27 -16 — 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 — -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1604 115.7 — — — — +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00 — 1500 100.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 — — +3.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.