H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Amanda Tobin vs Pam Shriver H2H: 0-1

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Tobin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1982 Beckenham round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Tobin
AUS Age 66 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-3 Amanda Tobin Match data Jun 5, 1982* R16 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Tobin #351 #138 4 1,632 45 77 36.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Tobin Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,537 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1977 3–5 37.5% — 1,535 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1978 8–10 44.4% — 1,558 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1979 2–6 25.0% — 1,503 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1980 6–9 40.0% — 1,564 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1981 7–6 53.8% — 1,612 0 2 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1982 5–7 41.7% — 1,604 0 3 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,604 0 3 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1984 0–4 0.0% — 1,521 0 3 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1985 3–5 37.5% — 1,560 0 3 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1986 5–13 27.8% #138 1,505 0 3 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1987 2–5 28.6% #210 1,472 0 3 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1988 0–1 0.0% #351 1,457 0 3 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 — — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Tobin Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1976 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1977 — — — — — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1978 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1987 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 16 25 36.0% 3 10 13 23.1% 25 47 72 34.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Tobin Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1976 1537 111.2 — — — — — — +75 50.0% +1.00 2–0 0–1 — +0.21 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1977 1536 103.1 — — — — — — +15 37.5% -0.63 — 0–1 — +0.67 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1978 1559 119.3 — — — — +90 -3 -15 45.7% -0.29 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +1.52 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1979 1503 92.9 — — — — — — +19 31.6% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +1.72 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1980 1564 108.2 — — — — — — -6 45.2% -0.29 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 101.0 +0.09 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1981 1613 117.9 — — — — — — -50 61.5% +0.73 0–2 1–0 — +0.39 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1982 1604 110.0 — — — — — -112 -1 41.7% -0.67 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.66 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1983 1605 115.8 — — — — — — -9 41.2% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.63 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1984 1521 88.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +1.02 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1985 1561 124.2 — — — — -49 — +40 45.0% +0.05 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.17 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1986 1505 106.5 — — — — +11 — +56 27.0% -2.03 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.6 +1.27 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1987 1473 97.7 — — — — +35 — +9 44.4% -0.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.93 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1988 1457 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.22 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1632 114.9 — — — — +18 -50 +4 40.6% -0.60 7–20 (26%) 15–9 (63%) 98.0 +6.64 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.