H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 10-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 10–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 7–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 New Haven third round 6-4 6-1.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
10 0
10 main draw meetings
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2009* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-4 6-1 Ai Sugiyama #68 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #21 6-2 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #33 Match data
Nov 4, 2005* Philadelphia WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-3 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #30 Match data
Oct 30, 2004* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #16 Match data
Nov 1, 2003* Philadelphia WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #7 3-6 7-6(6) 7-5 Ai Sugiyama #11 Match data
Aug 23, 2003* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-4 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #16 Match data
Feb 7, 2003* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #7 7-5 6-2 Ai Sugiyama #26 Match data
May 17, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-0 6-2 Ai Sugiyama #33 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #20 6-3 6-3 Ai Sugiyama #29 Match data
Jan 10, 2000* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-7(2) 6-0 7-6(5) Ai Sugiyama #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 411 362 53.2% 0 0 0 4 2 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Ai Sugiyama
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,487 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,557 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,691 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1996 22–18 55.0% #28 1,738 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,833 0 1
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,859 0 3
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,806 0 3
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2000 20–24 45.5% #32 1,687 0 3
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,720 0 3
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2004 30–22 57.7% #17 1,802 0 6
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,742 0 6
30 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,742 0 6
31 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,632 0 6
32 2008 26–21 55.3% #31 1,742 0 6
33 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,647 0 6