H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Alicia Molik H2H: 2-2
Amélie Mauresmo and Alicia Molik are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2005 Doha semifinal 7-6(11) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2005* | Doha | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Alicia Molik | 7-6(11) 6-1 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-3 7-6(2) | Alicia Molik | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2004* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alicia Molik | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Jan 28, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 7-5 7-5 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |