H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 4-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2002 Sydney fourth round 6-3 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-3 5-7 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data
May 12, 2001* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #8 Match data
Apr 15, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 F Clay Amélie Mauresmo #15 6-4 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #16 7-5 7-5 Amanda Coetzer #12 Match data
Apr 10, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #14 6-4 1-6 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #151 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9