H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 6-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–1 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on grass and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-1 3-6 6-3.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 6, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 3-6 6-3 Anastasia Myskina #11 Match data
Jun 30, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #10 Match data
Jan 17, 2004* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-4 7-6(4) Anastasia Myskina #7 Match data
Nov 2, 2003* Philadelphia WTA 500 F Hard Amélie Mauresmo #7 5-7 6-0 6-2 Anastasia Myskina #9 Match data
Oct 5, 2003* Moscow WTA 1000 F Carpet Anastasia Myskina #10 6-2 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data
Jun 30, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-4 6-2 Anastasia Myskina #15 Match data
Aug 29, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #7 3-6 6-1 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,084 235 138 63.0% 1 3 0 4 2 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anastasia Myskina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 2000 15–17 46.9% #58 1,657 0 1
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,707 0 1
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,882 0 2
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,958 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 2004 45–16 73.8% #3 2,040 1 9
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,934 1 10
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,818 1 10
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,769 1 10
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25