H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Anastasia Myskina H2H: 6-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–1 lead over Anastasia Myskina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on grass and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-1 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main-draw meetings
Anastasia Myskina
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 3-6 6-3 Anastasia Myskina #11 Match data Jul 6, 2006* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #10 Match data Jun 30, 2005* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-4 7-6(4) Anastasia Myskina #7 Match data Jan 17, 2004* QF Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #7 5-7 6-0 6-2 Anastasia Myskina #9 Match data Nov 2, 2003* F Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anastasia Myskina #10 6-2 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data Oct 5, 2003* F Moscow Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-4 6-2 Anastasia Myskina #15 Match data Jun 30, 2002* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #7 3-6 6-1 6-4 Anastasia Myskina #94 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Anastasia Myskina #1,101 #2 4,247 2,078 240 141 63.0% 1 2 0 3 4 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anastasia Myskina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1999 10–6 62.5% #65 1,620 0 1
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 2000 16–18 47.1% #58 1,659 0 1
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 2001 11–13 45.8% #59 1,716 0 1
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 2002 46–27 63.0% #11 1,883 0 2
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 2003 42–21 66.7% #7 1,957 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 2004 49–18 73.1% #3 2,043 1 9
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 2005 35–18 66.0% #14 1,935 1 10
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 2006 31–18 63.3% #16 1,821 1 10
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 2007 0–2 0.0% #1043 1,772 1 10
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 — — — — — — —
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 — — — — — — —
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 — — — — — — —
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anastasia Myskina
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 5 8 13 38.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2002 21 15 36 58.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 2003 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 0 8 100.0%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2004 32 14 46 69.6% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 27 11 38 71.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2006 13 11 24 54.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 125 82 207 60.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 36 15 51 70.6% 26 8 34 76.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's and 75/234 of Anastasia Myskina's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anastasia Myskina
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 11/63 2.6 3.3 55.0% 63.0% 45.8% 54.6% 54.3% 54.9% 48.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 15/67 2.1 4.9 53.1% 67.9% 47.8% 53.1% 56.7% 58.5% 50.8%
23 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3% 2005 14/53 2.1 3.2 56.1% 60.4% 48.8% 54.0% 55.1% 55.2% 49.4%
24 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1% 2006 33/49 1.5 3.4 62.0% 59.3% 45.9% 56.3% 52.9% 54.2% 46.9%
25 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6% 2007 2/2 1.0 3.5 57.0% 52.9% 30.6% 40.6% 12.5% 43.3% 34.8%
26 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1% — 75/381 1.9 3.6 57.9% 61.6% 46.4% 54.6% 53.2% 55.1% 48.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anastasia Myskina
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1999 1620 127.2 — — — — -30 +8 — 59.0% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) 104.6 +0.32
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 2000 1659 127.5 — — — — -67 -8 +28 48.8% -0.29 7–9 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 -0.66
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 2001 1716 138.4 — — — — -38 -105 +14 51.9% +0.04 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.5 -0.91
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 2002 1884 149.1 — — — — -69 -141 +13 57.4% +0.59 21–9 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 109.4 -2.10
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 2003 1958 153.9 +0.52 +3.26 1.066 52.0% -6 -162 -52 61.5% +0.76 12–7 (63%) 6–1 (86%) 107.0 -0.46
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 2004 2044 167.4 +2.89 +5.17 1.223 54.7% -6 -77 -143 67.7% +1.35 16–9 (64%) 6–6 (50%) 100.6 -2.19
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 2005 1935 144.8 +0.74 +3.08 1.103 52.3% +52 -92 -21 58.7% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 6–9 (40%) 98.5 +2.09
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 2006 1821 138.4 -0.60 +2.50 1.023 50.6% -7 +27 +205 62.5% +0.63 6–8 (43%) 10–5 (67%) 96.2 -0.39
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 2007 1772 94.1 -4.25 -1.94 0.614 39.1% — — — 20.0% -3.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 2078 153.4 +0.42 +3.14 1.067 51.6% -14 -79 +33 59.4% +0.65 84–59 (59%) 49–33 (60%) 108.0 -1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.