H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Anke Huber H2H: 2-3

Anke Huber holds a 3–2 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2001 Toronto fourth round 6-3 6-3.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2001 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anke Huber #21 6-3 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data
Feb 17, 2001* Nice WTA 500 SF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #14 2-6 6-1 6-1 Anke Huber #16 Match data
Feb 12, 2001* Paris WTA 500 F Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #14 7-6(2) 6-1 Anke Huber #16 Match data
Sep 7, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Anke Huber #27 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data
Oct 30, 1998* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Carpet Anke Huber #19 6-3 6-7 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25