H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 6-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Berlin third round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-4 6-1 Anna Smashnova #40 Match data
Mar 26, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #33 Match data
May 16, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-0 6-3 Anna Smashnova #23 Match data
May 9, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-3 6-2 Anna Smashnova #20 Match data
May 3, 2003* Warsaw WTA 500 QF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #7 3-6 6-4 6-3 Anna Smashnova #21 Match data
Feb 19, 2000* Hanover WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,882 242 221 52.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anna Smashnova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,599 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,574 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,560 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,582 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,637 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,668 0 2
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,793 0 6
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,857 0 8
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2004 28–23 54.9% #32 1,732 0 9
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,745 0 11
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,700 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,648 0 12