H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 6-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Berlin Open round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main-draw meetings
Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-4 6-1 Anna Smashnova #40 Match data May 5, 2005* R32 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #33 Match data Mar 26, 2005* R32 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-0 6-3 Anna Smashnova #23 Match data May 16, 2003* R16 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-3 6-2 Anna Smashnova #20 Match data May 9, 2003* R16 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #7 3-6 6-4 6-3 Anna Smashnova #21 Match data May 3, 2003* QF Warsaw Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-2 6-1 Anna Smashnova #47 Match data Feb 19, 2000* QF Hanover Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anna Smashnova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anna Smashnova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's and 26/185 of Anna Smashnova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anna Smashnova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1% 2003 4/58 0.3 4.5 66.1% 62.1% 46.2% 68.5% 41.2% 56.1% 45.9%
27 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7% 2004 2/52 0.0 4.0 68.3% 46.3% 26.8% 39.6% 47.3% 40.2% 47.2%
28 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5% 2005 7/40 0.4 3.7 62.1% 51.7% 43.1% 37.2% 40.9% 48.2% 43.4%
29 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1% 2006 12/32 0.1 4.9 69.0% 53.7% 41.6% 44.8% 46.0% 50.7% 43.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 77.4% 47.9% 50.0% 44.4% 25.0% 48.4% 41.6%
Career — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1% — 26/464 0.2 4.3 67.0% 53.7% 41.9% 46.0% 43.2% 50.0% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Anna Smashnova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1492 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 1992 1489 98.0 — — — — +33 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.20
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 1993 1486 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1994 1600 126.0 — — — — +9 -40 — 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.52
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 1995 1578 118.0 — — — — +7 +20 — 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 1996 1562 121.4 — — — — +39 -21 — 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -1.26
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 1998 1583 118.4 — — — — -14 +56 — 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1999 1636 138.3 — — — — -5 +52 — 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 2000 1669 125.9 — — — — -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 2001 1605 116.1 — — — — -128 +190 — 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 2002 1794 147.7 — — — — -18 +92 — 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 — 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 — 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.25
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 — 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) — — +0.02
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.