H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-0
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 2–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2001 Nice third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2001* | Nice | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-1 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1998* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-0 7-6 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amélie Mauresmo | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |