H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2003 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-7(1) 6-0 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2003 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Barbara Rittner #102 6-7(1) 6-0 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-4 6-0 Barbara Rittner #68 Match data
Oct 22, 1999* Bratislava WTA 250 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #11 3-6 6-4 6-4 Barbara Rittner #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2