H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #10 6-4 5-7 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #229 Match data May 30, 1996* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.