H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-3

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 WTA Tour Championships round-robin match 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 2003 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Chanda Rubin #10 4-6 6-4 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data
Mar 23, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #10 6-0 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data
Sep 2, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #7 7-5 7-5 Chanda Rubin #30 Match data
Jun 15, 1998 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Chanda Rubin #59 6-1 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7