H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 3-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Toronto fourth round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2005 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-0 6-2 Conchita Martínez #43 Match data
May 14, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-1 6-2 Conchita Martínez #47 Match data
May 14, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-4 Conchita Martínez #18 Match data
May 17, 1998* Berlin WTA 1000 F Clay Conchita Martínez #9 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 — — — — — — — 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 — — — — — — — 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33