H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 3-2

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–2 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2002 Antwerp quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2002* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-4 7-5 Daja Bedanova #33 Match data
Jan 9, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-3 7-6(6) Daja Bedanova #25 Match data
Oct 11, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-3 6-1 Daja Bedanova #29 Match data
Oct 5, 2001* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Daja Bedanova #28 6-2 6-7(6) 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data
Oct 4, 2000* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Daja Bedanova #87 5-7 6-3 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,801 64 71 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 2000 12–8 60.0% #53 1,688 0 1
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,768 0 1
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,712 0 1
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,594 0 1
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,596 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25