H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Dominique Monami H2H: 3-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–1 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 1999 Paris semifinal 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Dominique Monami
BEL Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-0 7-6 Dominique Monami #11 Match data Feb 27, 1999* SF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #29 6-3 7-6(3) Dominique Monami #12 Match data Jan 29, 1999* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Dominique Monami #9 6-3 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #30 Match data Oct 16, 1998* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #65 3-6 6-4 7-5 Dominique Monami #14 Match data May 13, 1998* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Dominique Monami #24 #9 2,196 1,974 208 158 56.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Dominique Monami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1991 4–5 44.4% #129 1,528 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 1992 9–14 39.1% #99 1,550 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 1993 15–14 51.7% #59 1,672 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1994 7–16 30.4% #134 1,601 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1995 12–9 57.1% #43 1,680 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1996 14–14 50.0% #48 1,698 0 1
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 1997 39–17 69.6% #18 1,875 0 3
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 1998 45–24 65.2% #12 1,918 0 4
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 1999 37–25 59.7% #14 1,840 0 4
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 2000 26–20 56.5% #24 1,842 0 4
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 — — — — — — —
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Dominique Monami
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1997 21 7 28 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 21 10 31 67.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 1999 17 11 28 60.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 16 13 29 55.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 100 74 174 57.5% 36 35 71 50.7% 25 18 43 58.1% 47 31 78 60.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Dominique Monami
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.59 1991 1529 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 50.0% -0.19 — — — +0.79
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.67 1992 1551 121.2 — — — — +78 -68 — 39.6% -0.74 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.30
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.71 1993 1673 124.4 — — — — +19 -121 — 51.6% -0.16 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.78
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) — -2.74 1994 1601 118.4 — — — — +38 -104 -2 34.0% -1.21 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.21
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.13 1995 1681 130.2 — — — — +6 — — 59.5% +0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.06
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) — -2.28 1996 1699 137.0 — — — — -80 -64 -8 52.5% +0.41 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.12
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.48 1997 1876 147.0 — — — — -17 -173 -163 66.9% +1.26 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.75
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.83 1998 1918 156.3 — — — — +11 -179 -122 62.9% +0.87 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.39
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) — -3.85 1999 1840 149.4 — — — — +15 -122 -45 58.8% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.82
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) — -1.04 2000 1842 150.9 — — — — +7 -105 +50 58.8% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.21
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 1974 148.4 — — — — +10 -125 -56 56.7% +0.49 46–41 (53%) 34–30 (53%) 105.7 +2.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.