H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Dominique Monami H2H: 3-1
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–1 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 1999 Paris semifinal 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1999* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-0 7-6 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-3 7-6(3) | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1998* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-3 6-4 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| May 13, 1998* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Amélie Mauresmo | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Dominique Monami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |