H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Fabiola Zuluaga H2H: 4-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2004 Australian Open quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Fabiola Zuluaga
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 30, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Fabiola Zuluaga #36 (w/o) Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-4 6-2 Fabiola Zuluaga #35 Match data
Jun 1, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #5 6-3 6-4 Fabiola Zuluaga #46 Match data
Aug 17, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-0 6-2 Fabiola Zuluaga #109 Match data
May 20, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-1 6-2 Fabiola Zuluaga #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Fabiola Zuluaga #85 #16 1,362 1,856 113 97 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Fabiola Zuluaga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #386 1,484 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #290 1,480 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #138 1,465 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #169 1,459 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1998 3–2 60.0% #87 1,504 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1999 19–11 63.3% #51 1,686 0 2
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2000 18–18 50.0% #39 1,688 0 2
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 — — — — — — —
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2002 13–12 52.0% #75 1,658 0 3
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2003 21–17 55.3% #38 1,736 0 4
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2004 27–19 58.7% #23 1,746 0 5
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2005 12–13 48.0% #85 1,683 0 5
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 — — — — — — —
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 — — — — — — —
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 — — — — — — —