H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Iva Majoli H2H: 2-1
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 2–1 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on clay, while Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2001 Berlin third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2001* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-3 6-1 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-2 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1996* | Rosmalen | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Iva Majoli | 6-4 6-2 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |