H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Jennifer Capriati H2H: 7-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 7–4 lead over Jennifer Capriati in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–1 on clay, while Jennifer Capriati leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2004 Italian Open final 3-6 6-3 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 4
11 main-draw meetings
Jennifer Capriati
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #3 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) Jennifer Capriati #8 Match data May 16, 2004* F Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 6-0 Jennifer Capriati #8 Match data May 8, 2004* SF Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Jennifer Capriati #7 6-3 3-1 (ret.) Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data Aug 23, 2003* SF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-3 7-6(10) Jennifer Capriati #7 Match data May 17, 2003* QF Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #9 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Jennifer Capriati #3 Match data Sep 5, 2002* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-4 6-1 Jennifer Capriati #3 Match data Aug 18, 2002* F Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-3 6-2 Jennifer Capriati #3 Match data Jul 5, 2002* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jennifer Capriati #2 6-2 3-6 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #11 Match data May 18, 2002* QF Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Jennifer Capriati #1 6-2 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #9 Match data Jan 25, 2002* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jennifer Capriati #2 6-3 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data Sep 6, 2001* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-4 2-6 6-3 Jennifer Capriati #4 Match data May 13, 2001* F Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 0 6 1 15 1 25
Jennifer Capriati #54 #1 5,123 2,253 411 170 70.7% 3 1 2 0 2 6 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Jennifer Capriati
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 37–11 77.1% #8 1,962 0 1
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1991 39–11 78.0% #6 2,193 0 3
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1992 35–11 76.1% #7 2,204 0 5
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1993 30–11 73.2% #9 2,156 0 6
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #42 2,133 0 6
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 1996 16–9 64.0% #36 2,078 0 6
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1997 10–12 45.5% #65 1,910 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1998 8–12 40.0% #99 1,764 0 6
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1999 26–13 66.7% #23 1,912 0 8
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 2000 35–19 64.8% #14 1,908 0 9
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 2001 56–14 80.0% #2 2,096 2 12
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 2002 48–16 75.0% #3 2,019 3 13
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 2003 42–18 70.0% #6 2,022 3 14
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 2004 29–12 70.7% #10 2,020 3 14
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Jennifer Capriati
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 4 22 81.8% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 20 3 23 87.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 10 3 13 76.9% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 14 4 18 77.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1997 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1999 14 7 21 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2000 21 11 32 65.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 32 10 42 76.2% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 2002 30 11 41 73.2% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 25 11 36 69.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 12 7 19 63.2% 13 4 17 76.5% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 213 88 301 70.8% 121 47 168 72.0% 46 15 61 75.4% 31 20 51 60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's and 31/101 of Jennifer Capriati's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Jennifer Capriati
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7% 2003 15/60 2.9 3.9 57.8% 71.0% 51.8% 55.7% 53.2% 63.1% 53.5%
28 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5% 2004 16/41 2.5 2.8 64.8% 67.6% 51.8% 43.9% 45.7% 61.7% 47.4%
29 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1% — 31/581 2.7 3.3 61.4% 69.2% 51.8% 49.6% 49.3% 62.4% 50.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Jennifer Capriati
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1962 165.3 — — — — -89 -118 -299 73.8% +1.71 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 108.9 -1.20
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 1991 2193 172.3 — — — — -39 -251 -410 73.6% +1.89 6–4 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 103.7 -2.21
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 1992 2204 166.4 — — — — -40 -116 -327 70.8% +1.41 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 106.0 -3.08
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1993 2157 170.7 — — — — +9 -75 -205 66.3% +1.68 11–7 (61%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 -2.41
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 1994 2134 109.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.17
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 1996 2079 163.0 — — — — +14 — — 64.0% +0.96 2–2 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 -1.41
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 1997 1911 146.0 — — — — +17 +101 — 49.0% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 95.7 -1.31
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1998 1764 130.1 — — — — +84 +151 — 45.8% -0.23 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.36
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 1999 1912 147.1 — — — — -14 +15 — 59.1% +0.65 10–2 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 106.4 -2.28
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 2000 1909 154.0 — — — — +20 -74 +142 59.5% +0.65 11–4 (73%) 10–3 (77%) 108.8 -1.61
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 2001 2097 171.2 — — — — -40 -19 +31 73.3% +1.61 16–11 (59%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -3.91
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 2002 2020 164.6 — — — — +15 +70 +124 69.1% +1.58 14–9 (61%) 3–6 (33%) 96.3 -0.66
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 2003 2022 162.1 +5.66 +6.87 1.449 58.1% +9 +59 +108 68.6% +1.42 9–14 (39%) 6–6 (50%) 92.2 -0.42
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 2004 2020 149.6 +5.09 +3.12 1.238 54.1% -61 +96 +157 65.6% +1.08 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 101.8 -1.09
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 2253 169.4 +5.37 +4.93 1.338 56.1% -14 -17 -51 66.6% +1.25 106–76 (58%) 58–46 (56%) 103.9 -3.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.