H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-2

Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1997 Strasbourg Open round of 16 3-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #19 3-6 7-5 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #133 Match data May 23, 1997* R16 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Judith Wiesner #13 3-6 7-5 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #162 Match data Feb 13, 1997* R32 Linz Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Judith Wiesner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Judith Wiesner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.