H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Justine Henin H2H: 6-7
Justine Henin holds a 7–6 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on hard courts, while Justine Henin leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2007 Eastbourne final 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6
–
7
13 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2007* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Justine Henin | 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2007* | Dubai | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 7-5 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2006* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-3 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Nov 6, 2006 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jul 8, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Amélie Mauresmo | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| May 13, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Justine Henin | 6-1 6-2 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Jan 28, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | F | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-1 2-0 (ret.) | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Justine Henin | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2004* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2004* | Sydney | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Justine Henin | 6-4 6-4 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2003* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | SF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | Justine Henin | Match data |
| May 10, 2003* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Justine Henin | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-1 6-4 | Justine Henin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Justine Henin | #13 | #1 | 7,626 | 2,384 | 442 | 102 | 81.2% | 7 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 5 | 42 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Justine Henin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #69 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #45 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #5 | 2,003 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,211 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 30–4 | 88.2% | #8 | 2,201 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 34–5 | 87.2% | #6 | 2,199 | 4 | 22 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 57–8 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,276 | 5 | 28 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 2007 | 63–4 | 94.0% | #1 | 2,373 | 7 | 38 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 2008 | 17–4 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,278 | 7 | 40 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | 2010 | 32–7 | 82.1% | #12 | 2,199 | 7 | 42 |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #13 | 2,173 | 7 | 42 |