H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Justine Henin H2H: 6-8

Justine Henin holds an 8–6 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 5–4 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2007 Eastbourne Open final 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(2).

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 8
14 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justine Henin #1 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(2) Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data Jun 24, 2007* F Eastbourne Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Justine Henin #2 6-4 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data Feb 25, 2007* F Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Justine Henin #3 6-4 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data Nov 12, 2006* F WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #1 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Justine Henin #3 Match data Nov 6, 2006 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #1 2-6 6-3 6-4 Justine Henin #3 Match data Jul 8, 2006* F Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Justine Henin #7 6-1 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data May 13, 2006* SF Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-1 2-0 (ret.) Justine Henin #6 Match data Jan 28, 2006* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Justine Henin #5 7-5 3-6 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data Aug 20, 2005* SF Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Justine Henin #1 6-3 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #2 Match data Aug 22, 2004* F Athens Olympics Olympics Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Justine Henin #1 Match data Apr 10, 2004* SF Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Justine Henin #1 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data Jan 18, 2004* F Sydney International Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #4 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 Justine Henin #1 Match data Nov 12, 2003* SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Justine Henin #4 7-6(6) 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #6 Match data May 10, 2003* SF Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #16 6-1 6-4 Justine Henin #95 Match data Sep 1, 1999* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 0 6 1 15 1 25
Justine Henin #13 #1 7,626 2,393 448 102 81.5% 7 1 10 2 18 5 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Justine Henin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1999 11–6 64.7% #69 1,655 0 1
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 2000 17–13 56.7% #45 1,749 0 1
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 2001 56–18 75.7% #7 1,984 0 4
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 2002 50–21 70.4% #5 2,003 0 6
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 2003 73–11 86.9% #1 2,211 2 14
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 2004 36–4 90.0% #8 2,222 3 19
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 2005 34–5 87.2% #6 2,214 4 23
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 2006 57–8 87.7% #1 2,287 5 29
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 2007 63–4 94.0% #1 2,383 7 39
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 2008 17–4 81.0% #1 2,287 7 41
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 2010 32–7 82.1% #12 2,206 7 43
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 2011 2–1 66.7% #13 2,181 7 43

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Justine Henin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 2 2 4 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 31 11 42 73.8% 14 4 18 77.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2002 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 2003 40 6 46 87.0% 20 1 21 95.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2004 32 2 34 94.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 10 4 14 71.4% 24 0 24 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 2006 33 5 38 86.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 10 1 11 90.9%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 38 1 39 97.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 2008 16 3 19 84.2% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 16 4 20 80.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 2011 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% 254 58 312 81.4% 122 21 143 85.3% 53 11 64 82.8% 19 12 31 61.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's and 228/358 of Justine Henin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Justine Henin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 —/— 2003 20/84 2.5 3.4 53.3% 73.0% 53.7% 58.7% 56.5% 63.9% 51.6%
22 —/— 2004 13/40 3.0 5.3 50.1% 69.4% 51.2% 59.1% 54.8% 60.1% 51.6%
23 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3% 2005 16/39 2.2 6.5 50.6% 71.0% 42.7% 61.1% 54.0% 56.9% 52.3%
24 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1% 2006 56/65 2.5 4.0 56.8% 71.5% 52.9% 51.3% 54.5% 63.4% 53.1%
25 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6% 2007 64/67 3.1 4.0 55.3% 72.7% 52.5% 57.6% 54.0% 63.7% 50.9%
26 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1% 2008 18/21 3.2 4.8 50.9% 69.9% 48.1% 63.5% 48.4% 59.0% 47.9%
27 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7% —/—
28 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5% 2010 38/39 3.7 4.9 55.6% 71.7% 51.6% 54.2% 53.7% 62.9% 47.0%
29 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1% 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 54.4% 72.4% 51.9% 63.3% 48.1% 63.3% 46.6%
Career 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1% 228/550 2.9 4.4 54.6% 71.7% 51.4% 56.4% 53.8% 62.5% 50.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Justine Henin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.12
16 1996 1523 102.5 50.0% -0.20 1–1 +0.03
17 1997 1556 126.4 -24 +36 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1999 1655 135.1 -44 -20 64.1% +1.38 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.55
18 1998 1729 146.0 -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 2000 1749 144.4 -25 -104 -162 59.1% +0.74 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.83
19 1999 1912 159.1 -27 -138 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 2001 1984 161.8 -70 -139 -32 73.7% +1.68 12–11 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 100.5 -2.53
20 2000 1907 163.5 -30 +17 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 2002 2004 159.7 -54 -47 +40 66.5% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 98.9 -1.42
21 2001 2023 167.1 -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 2003 2211 171.2 +6.75 +6.21 1.432 57.6% -57 -5 -130 80.4% +2.15 16–4 (80%) 8–3 (73%) 110.8 -2.83
22 2002 2062 162.6 +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 2004 2223 165.8 +3.52 +5.52 1.296 55.6% +14 -53 84.7% +2.27 5–2 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 104.0 -0.39
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 2005 2215 154.4 +1.66 +6.12 1.214 54.5% -50 +146 75.6% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 5–1 (83%) 107.2 -1.31
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 2006 2288 172.1 +7.32 +9.10 1.453 57.9% -24 +29 -105 83.9% +2.57 8–5 (62%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 -3.18
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 2007 2384 173.7 +7.78 +7.96 1.402 56.9% +1 +34 -126 85.4% +2.48 14–3 (82%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 -1.25
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 2008 2287 147.8 +2.60 +2.75 1.166 53.4% +23 71.7% +1.61 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 95.1 +0.11
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 2010 2207 159.2 +6.24 +4.44 1.266 54.5% +37 +55 +20 76.3% +1.49 8–7 (53%) 7–3 (70%) 96.9 -1.91
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 2011 2181 117.1 +2.80 +0.16 1.268 54.6% +36 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–1 -0.01
Career 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 2394 169.9 +6.17 +6.72 1.351 56.2% -27 +4 -64 76.2% +1.83 97–54 (64%) 68–42 (62%) 107.0 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.