H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 3-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–1 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2005 Zurich fourth round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Katarina Srebotnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2005* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Katarina Srebotnik #43 6-2 6-0 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Jun 17, 2002 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-2 6-1 Katarina Srebotnik #46 Match data
Jan 18, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 7-5 6-3 Katarina Srebotnik #108 Match data
May 5, 2000* Bol WTA 500 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #17 6-3 6-2 Katarina Srebotnik #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,845 224 204 52.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 2000 8–18 30.8% #120 1,484 0 1
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,512 0 1
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,727 0 2
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2004 13–18 41.9% #87 1,596 0 2
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,752 0 4
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,830 0 4
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,740 0 4
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,621 0 4