H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 5-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 5–1 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2001 Nice fourth round 6-2 6-2.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2001* Nice WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-2 6-2 Kveta Peschke #53 Match data
Oct 18, 2000* Linz WTA 500 R16 Carpet Kveta Peschke #36 2-6 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-1 6-0 Kveta Peschke #43 Match data
May 18, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-0 6-2 Kveta Peschke #44 Match data
Oct 23, 1999* Bratislava WTA 250 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #11 (w/o) Kveta Peschke #99 Match data
Aug 26, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #17 6-4 3-6 7-5 Kveta Peschke #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,826 92 115 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Kveta Peschke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,699 0 1
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2000 18–15 54.5% #47 1,809 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,716 0 1
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,676 0 1
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,676 0 1
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,770 0 1
30 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,593 0 1
31 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,599 0 1