H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 5-1 (incl. walkovers)

Amélie Mauresmo vs Kveta Peschke: 4–1 excluding walkovers; 5–1 including 1 walkover. Across 6 main-draw results including walkovers, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2001 Nice round of 16 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H including walkovers
5 – 1
6 main-draw results
Kveta Peschke
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-2 6-2 Kveta Peschke #53 Match data Feb 16, 2001* R16 Nice Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Kveta Peschke #36 2-6 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data Oct 18, 2000* R16 Linz Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-1 6-0 Kveta Peschke #43 Match data Jun 4, 2000* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-0 6-2 Kveta Peschke #44 Match data May 18, 2000* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #11 (w/o) Kveta Peschke #99 Match data Oct 23, 1999* SF Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #17 6-4 3-6 7-5 Kveta Peschke #85 Match data Aug 26, 1999* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,806 92 116 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Kveta Peschke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 — — — — — — —
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,703 0 1
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 2000 18–16 52.9% #47 1,790 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,710 0 1
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,673 0 1
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 — — — — — — —
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,675 0 1
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,769 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,594 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,600 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Kveta Peschke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 9 8 17 52.9% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 41 57 98 41.8% 31 33 64 48.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 13 15 28 46.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's and 34/75 of Kveta Peschke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Kveta Peschke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5% 2004 2/6 2.0 1.5 63.2% 61.3% 52.4% 33.9% 32.2% 58.1% 45.8%
29 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1% 2005 8/40 0.9 4.8 56.4% 67.1% 38.3% 66.7% 44.7% 54.3% 50.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 22/27 0.9 3.6 60.2% 56.2% 39.8% 45.2% 36.4% 49.5% 41.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 0.5 3.5 74.4% 52.8% 40.9% 51.9% 76.7% 49.8% 45.6%
Career — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1% — 34/208 0.9 3.8 60.3% 58.9% 40.2% 50.0% 40.5% 51.1% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Kveta Peschke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1993 1510 110.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — -0.41
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 1994 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1998 1568 122.5 — — — — -52 +106 — 48.1% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 +0.78
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 1999 1704 141.0 — — — — -52 -7 — 42.9% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -0.83
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 2000 1791 137.4 — — — — -59 -53 — 49.4% -0.48 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 107.0 -2.20
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 2001 1711 130.0 — — — — +7 -42 — 45.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.6 -1.12
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 2002 1674 121.8 — — — — +8 — -162 39.4% -0.39 2–5 (29%) — — -1.13
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 2004 1675 115.7 +1.25 +0.61 1.094 51.2% +20 -45 — 50.0% +0.36 1–1 1–1 — -0.08
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 2005 1770 145.7 +0.02 +2.42 1.095 52.3% -32 -63 -203 54.8% +0.31 4–9 (31%) 6–3 (67%) 97.6 -2.24
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1595 110.3 -4.62 -1.44 0.822 45.7% -4 +15 +34 35.1% -1.07 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.9 +1.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1601 103.8 -0.67 +2.50 0.908 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 1806 139.1 -2.95 -0.18 0.901 47.7% -26 -3 -117 46.1% -0.32 34–40 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.4 -2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.