H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 5-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 5–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2004 Filderstadt quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-4 6-1 Lisa Raymond #30 Match data
Nov 1, 2003* Philadelphia WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-3 6-3 Lisa Raymond #30 Match data
Apr 20, 2001* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #9 7-5 7-5 Lisa Raymond #25 Match data
Apr 13, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #15 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 Lisa Raymond #25 Match data
Oct 25, 2000* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #16 6-2 6-4 Lisa Raymond #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4