H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 6-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Paris quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2005* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-2 7-6(2) Magdalena Maleeva #31 Match data
Jun 19, 2004* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-4 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #23 Match data
Jun 1, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #22 Match data
Oct 5, 2002* Moscow WTA 1000 SF Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #23 7-5 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data
Aug 22, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #8 6-3 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #15 Match data
Feb 18, 2001* Nice WTA 500 F Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #14 6-2 6-0 Magdalena Maleeva #20 Match data
Oct 26, 2000* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #16 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Magdalena Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10