H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Mary Pierce H2H: 6-4
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–4 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Paris final 6-1 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6
–
4
10 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2006* | Paris | WTA 500 | F | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-1 7-6(2) | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Nov 13, 2005* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | F | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2005 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Mary Pierce | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-4 6-1 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-1 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2005* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| May 19, 2000* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-3 6-4 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2000* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1999* | Linz | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 7-5 6-3 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
| May 8, 1999* | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |