H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Mary Pierce H2H: 6-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–4 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Paris final 6-1 7-6(2).

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 4
10 main draw meetings
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2006* Paris WTA 500 F Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-1 7-6(2) Mary Pierce #6 Match data
Nov 13, 2005* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals F Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Nov 7, 2005 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Mary Pierce #5 2-6 6-4 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Sep 8, 2005* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Mary Pierce #12 6-4 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Feb 18, 2005* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-4 6-1 Mary Pierce #32 Match data
Feb 11, 2005* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-4 6-3 Mary Pierce #27 Match data
May 19, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-3 6-4 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Jan 12, 2000* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Oct 30, 1999* Linz WTA 500 SF Carpet Mary Pierce #6 7-5 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #12 Match data
May 8, 1999* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Mary Pierce #8 6-7 6-2 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18