H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Monica Seles H2H: 2-3

Monica Seles holds a 3–2 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Monica Seles leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2003 Dubai semifinal 6-3 2-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 2003* Dubai WTA 500 SF Hard Monica Seles #11 6-3 2-2 (ret.) Amélie Mauresmo #7 Match data
Feb 23, 2002* Dubai WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-4 6-3 Monica Seles #6 Match data
Jan 12, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #16 6-4 7-6(5) Monica Seles #4 Match data
Jun 6, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Monica Seles #3 7-5 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #14 Match data
May 21, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 F Clay Monica Seles #7 6-2 7-6(4) Amélie Mauresmo #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53