H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 6-3

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–3 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 US Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-2.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #29 4-6 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #86 Match data
Aug 16, 2008* Cincinnati WTA 500 SF Hard Nathalie Dechy #92 6-4 3-6 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #35 Match data
Jan 4, 2008* Gold Coast WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #18 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #68 Match data
May 30, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #46 Match data
Feb 9, 2007* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #53 Match data
Jun 23, 2006* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Nathalie Dechy #25 3-6 6-2 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
May 13, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 7-5 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #25 Match data
May 16, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-1 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #28 Match data
Apr 1, 1999* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nathalie Dechy #31 6-4 0-6 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1