H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 3-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2001 US Open round of 16 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data Sep 4, 2001* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #19 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #11 Match data Feb 11, 2001* SF Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amélie Mauresmo #32 7-6 6-0 Nathalie Tauziat #9 Match data Aug 27, 1998* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nathalie Tauziat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nathalie Tauziat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.