H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 3-0
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2001 US Open fourth round 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2001* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-1 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1998* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 7-6 6-0 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Nathalie Tauziat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 |