H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 5–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 6-2 Nicole Pratt #136 Match data Jul 1, 2006* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #12 6-2 6-1 Nicole Pratt #40 Match data May 30, 2002* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Amélie Mauresmo #6 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 Nicole Pratt #75 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #20 6-0 7-5 Nicole Pratt #52 Match data Jan 19, 2001* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Amélie Mauresmo #29 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #102 Match data Jan 24, 1999* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.