H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 5–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 6-2 Nicole Pratt #136 Match data
May 30, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #12 6-2 6-1 Nicole Pratt #40 Match data
Jun 27, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #6 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 Nicole Pratt #75 Match data
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #20 6-0 7-5 Nicole Pratt #52 Match data
Jan 24, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #29 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1