H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 2-3

Nicole Vaidisova holds a 3–2 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2007 Wimbledon fourth round 7-6(6) 4-6 6-1.

FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 3, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Nicole Vaidisova #10 7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Oct 14, 2006* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Carpet Nicole Vaidisova #11 1-6 7-5 7-6(3) Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Jun 5, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Nicole Vaidisova #16 6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #1 Match data
Jan 24, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-1 6-1 Nicole Vaidisova #16 Match data
Nov 5, 2005* Philadelphia WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 7-5 7-5 Nicole Vaidisova #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Nicole Vaidisova #832 #7 1,981 1,997 155 84 64.9% 0 0 0 3 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Nicole Vaidisova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 2004 14–5 73.7% #75 1,674 0 2
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 2005 45–14 76.3% #15 1,948 0 5
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 2006 35–17 67.3% #10 1,916 0 6
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 2007 35–14 71.4% #12 1,946 0 6
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 2008 17–18 48.6% #41 1,711 0 6
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 2009 7–12 36.8% #175 1,578 0 6
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2010 1–1 50.0% #666 1,579 0 6
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2015 1–3 25.0% #261 1,566 0 6
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25