H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 6-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–0 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Rome fourth round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-4 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #20 Match data
Jun 30, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #4 7-5 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #19 Match data
May 15, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-1 2-6 7-5 Silvia Farina Elia #15 Match data
Apr 10, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 QF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-4 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #15 Match data
May 10, 2002* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #10 6-3 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #12 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #99 7-6(4) 7-5 Silvia Farina Elia #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Silvia Farina Elia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3